Loading...
Loading...
Our peer review framework, ethical governance standards, and the recognition program that honours your scholarly contribution.
GTS Press employs a Double-Blind review process to ensure objectivity and technical integrity.
The primary duty of a GTS Press reviewer is to conduct a detailed technical review of the manuscript's foundation. This involves validating the originality of the research questions, assessing the rigor of the experimental methodology, and ensuring that the data interpretation is sound and logical.
Peer review at GTS Press is viewed as a collaborative mentoring process designed to elevate research quality. Reviewers are expected to provide detailed, actionable critiques that guide authors toward improving the technical clarity and scientific impact of their work.
GTS Press is a COPE member. All reviewers must adhere strictly to its ethical principles.
The content of manuscripts under review must never be shared, disclosed, or used for personal gain. Violation of confidentiality constitutes serious research misconduct.
GTS Press recognises that the scholarly ecosystem depends on the voluntary dedication of expert reviewers.
Every reviewer receives a formal, verified certificate for each completed assessment, usable for institutional performance reviews and academic career advancement.
Active reviewers accumulate "Editorial Credits" that can be redeemed for significant waivers on Article Processing Charges (APC) for their own future manuscript submissions.
Exceptional reviewers who consistently provide high-quality, timely evaluations are considered for promotion to the GTS Press Associate Editorial Board.
Common questions from our peer review community.